![]() ![]() Chinese preschoolers’ implicit and explicit false- belief understanding. Wang, B., Low, J., Jing, Z., & Qinghua, Q. But what’s BJDP:BJDP2052? I’m sure you guessed it: So you want them to be short and memorable, usually the first author and a date, maybe the beginning of the title. For those not using BibTeX, these are the nicknames you assign to an article, so that when you are referencing it later, you just call its nickname, either by writing it out or looking it up in LyX. Lastly, the cite keys provided by journals are often completely useless. Often file endings are missing, confusing Opera (but apparently not Chrome). I have also noticed that particular in Cambridge University Press Journals, names or titles are all caps, which doesn’t go to well with certain bibtex packages either. This leads packages like apacite to create false URL fields. Also, often the URL field contains a DOI- URL, which duplicates the DOI field. ![]() Sometimes BibDesk can fix them, sometimes it cannot parse them at all. When downloading BibTeX citations, often illegal characters appear in the cite keys and names, brackets are missing, throwing errors. What’s following is a brief rant on journal’s low quality BibTeX download and a few general observations. However, whilst this is great most of the time, there are many cases where journals are delivering broken BibTeX that BibDesk cannot parse, or that are just not well formed. One of the best things about it is that you can often fetch bibliographic information straight from the journal’s websites, Google Scholar or other sources. I have already written about my love for BibTeX and BibDesk for referencing. Why do journals provide broken BibTeX files?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |